Address: 9 Market Square, Amersham, HP7 0DF
Telephone: 01494 726611
Website: www.artichokerestaurant.co.uk
Date of visit: 23 November 2011
Costs: From £21.50 (2 course set lunch) onwards. Budget for £30+ a head plus drinks.
Wines and beer: Interesting wine list with a wide range (price). They have 1996 Les Ormes de Pez at £120 (note: 12.5% service on top) a bottle. I bought this wine at under £15 a bottle and there will still be a couple of bottles left somewhere in my cellar. It is a good St Estephe but not a great one. It will probably retail at the moment for £30 plus. So the mark up here is between 3-4 X
Likes and dislikes: Top notch cuisine at a very reasonable price – the seasoning was just right. They did not go OTT with salt or sugar. However, there is an over use of foam – unfortunately, you can’t heat foam up.
Cuisine: Modern European – Haute Cuisine
Summary:
“Old” Amersham is an old market town and surprisingly enough, there are 3 decent restaurants located within 100 meters of each other. Artichoke is the top one, getting decent reviews in The Good Food Guide and The Sunday Times/Harden top 100 UK restaurant Guide. (There is a new Amersham which joins onto old Amersham).
The outside is fairly non descriptive and you could easily miss it. In fact, the outside is very similar to The Fat Duck – grey painted wood etc.
Inside is a bar and modern dining room with brown wood tables and white leather chairs. The dining room has an open kitchen attached to it. There is an outside dining area and another dining room upstairs. Excluding the Garden, the place sits just over 30 comfortably.
I arrived early – first customer – and was greeted by the French Maitre ’D/Sommelier. Within 5 minutes, I was greeted by the chef. They offer 3 menus: set lunch, a la carte and the tasting menu.
I settled for the lunch tasting menu (5 courses and a freebie amuse bouche). This was priced at £35. For another £18, they offer 3 glasses of wine to pair with the meal. I went for it. In the evening, it is £62 for 7 courses.
The place soon filled up. By the time I left, downstairs was full.
As my table looks straight into the kitchen, it was very interesting to observe that they run by stations with the final station an assembly point supervised by the chef. There were 5 chefs in the kitchen, another 4 at the front of house. So for £35 (plus 12.5% service) for the tasting menu, it was very reasonable as the wage bill must be huge.
The amuse bouche was a small cube of ham hock with a quenelle of pease pudding and twoslivers of gurkins on a glass plate. It was good especially the slivers of gurkin which was crunchy, fresh and slightly vinegary.
Next came the soup . According to the menu, it was kohlrabi soup, blue cheese crutons. This was the only disappointment.The soup which tasted like cream of chicken soup was an entire dish of foam. This was in a normal size soup plate not one of these huge plate with a well that can only take 50mls of liquid. There were 4 dollops of cream on it with tasted of blue cheese. The croutons were thin slivers – like a melba toast cut into 5mmX10mm. The trouble with a foam soup is that it can only be served luke warm. I would have preferred this hot.
Next came the pan fried mackerel fillet, baby beetroot, horseradish foam and celeriac remoulade. The beet root was both the normal purple ones and small golden ones which I have never came across. The dish worked well. The fish cooked just right and the celeriac provided a different taste and texture. With this I was offered a glass of 2010 South African Chardonnay (neil ellis, elgin). The wine was quite minerally and fruity. There was no buttery taste. Although the sommelier said that it was similar to a French, it was more like a mersault.
The main course was a roast pheasant breast, swede puree, brussel sprout leaves, bacon fondant, apple puree. This was sewrved witha shiraz-viognier (willunga 100, Mclaren Vale). The wine was very smooth and non tannic which indicate that the wine was never matured in oak barrels. The pheasant was not too gamey and the skin was slightly crisp. The potato fondant was cooked in a bacon broth abd the sprout came a separate leaves that were still crunchy. It was a well made dish. Slight criticism is that as a result of the presentation, you only get a smear of gravy. The swede puree was there to add extra wetness to the dish.
I was then served a chilled grapefruit salad with granite, jelly and herbs. This was in fact a sorbet with larger ice crystals. It came in a glass rested on a slate. There were groves cut into the slste so that the glass and spoon fitted exactly.
For dessert I had apple press, cinnamon and caramelised honey panna cotta, apple salad, green apple sorbet served on a wooden board. This was absolutely divine. The apple sorbet sat on a pile of matchstick granny smith apple. The panna cotta tasted of caramel with a hint of cinnamon. The apple press was like a small cake made up of layers of apples that still had a slight crunchy texture. It tasted of tart tatin without the pastry. With this came my last glass of wine a 2009 muscat de beaumes.I have had musct de beaumes for 20 years and I must admit that I still prefer sauternes for a sweet wine.
Well, you get everything here – plates, slates and wooden boards!
This was a top notch meal at around £50 despite the criticism. I do not understand why The Michelin Guide only gave this place 2 spoons and forks in the 2012 edition. Is it because there is no table cloth? But then The Hand and Flower doesn’t have table cloths.
E
PS The warm bread rolls they serve with the meal were amongst the best that I have ever eaten.